• Categories

  • Post Archives

    • > Follow us on Twitter
    • Latest Posts

    • Meta

    Posts Tagged
    ‘voting rights’



    War on Voting: Two Victories This Week

    Friday, April 1st, 2011

    Two glimmers of hope in the war on voting to report. Legislators in both Arkansas and Iowa rejected restrictive photo ID measures this week. (They join Colorado, Hawaii, Mississippi, and New Mexico as the states where laws to make it harder to vote have been stopped this year.)

    The Iowa victory was particularly important because all of Iowa’s county auditors – the people who actually run elections in the state – came out against the bill, saying photo ID requirements were unnecessary, costly, and flawed. Among the auditors, there are 60 Republicans, 38 Democrats and one independent. I don’t think I’ve ever said this before, but “Go auditors!”

    A recent article highlighted Jasper County and 49 other counties that have systems to ensure integrity and guarantee voters are who they say they are without resorting to disenfranchising methods like only accepting state-issued photo ID:

    Jasper County began using laptop computers equipped with the Precinct Atlas Program to check voters at the polls. Forty-nine other counties in Iowa also use the program. Precinct Atlas contains all of the vital information about voters registered in Jasper County to verify their true identity. Poll workers are provided with the voter’s birth date, address, telephone number, the last four digits of their Social Security number, a driver’s license number, and whether that person is a convicted felon.

    If a voter shows up at the wrong polling place to vote, the program prints out a label with the address of the voter’s correct precinct and polling place.

    “With this information, it would be extremely difficult for a person to pass themselves off as someone else to vote,” [Jasper County Auditor Dennis] Parrott said.

    For those of us who are interested in modernizing and improving the system, these Iowa counties look like a good model.

    In the meantime, we still have to fight back against those who are trying to turn back the clock. As we like to say here at HQ, “in America, we Rock the vote, we don’t block the vote” . . . so sign up to fight back in the war on voting here.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    New Hampshire: ACTION ALERT

    Tuesday, March 29th, 2011

    ACTION ALERT: The New Hampshire Senate is voting on a photo ID bill that threatens voting rights on Wednesday, March 30th. (That’s tomorrow, as I am writing; today, probably, as you’re reading!)

    Please call your Senator and urge him or her to vote NO on SB 129. (You can find your Senator by clicking here.)

    You also can send an email to your Senator by using our handy system. Just click here to get started. It is super fast and easy.

    Some background: this bill would require all voters to present government-issued photo identification in order to exercise their constitutional right to vote. Student, young adult, elderly, disabled, and non-driver voters would be unfairly affected by this new law.

    There are 42,000 voting age citizens in New Hampshire who do not have a driver’s license or non-driver photo identification. Thousands more have photo identification that does not meet the requirements of this bill. To wit: this bill defines acceptable student IDs so narrowly that college students would not be able to use their student ID cards to vote.

    Get this: to prevent any qualified voter who does not possess photo ID from being turned away at the polls, a costly amendment to this bill (SB 129) was added to provide picture taking equipment at each polling location in the state. New Hampshire does not have a history of voting fraud. But there is a budget crisis facing the state and localities. Yet politicians are proposing a costly new government program to address a problem that doesn’t exist. (Other states that have implemented photo ID requirements have had to budget millions of dollars for less severe changes in election procedures.)

    You may remember that a multi-partisan coalition of students already beat back one form of voter suppression – a crazy and unconstitutional change to the definition of residency that would have made it impossible for some college students to vote at school. (Coverage here, here, and here.) Here’s hoping that students and other young voters step up and help stop this unnecessary and costly threat to voting rights.

    Take action and spread the word.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    Voting rights now part of Wisconsin battle

    Tuesday, February 22nd, 2011

    The legislative roller coaster in Wisconsin just got a bit more twisted.

    According to Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, “Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) threatened to force a vote soon on a bill that would require voters to show ID at the polls, in a move meant to lure Democrats boycotting the Senate back to Wisconsin.”

    Presumably, Republicans believe Democrats will rush back to Madison to oppose a bill that would disenfranchise thousands of Wisconsin citizens and, once the Democrats are back, Republicans will have the quorum they need to pass the budget bill. Or they just want to pass the most restrictive voter ID bill in the country and don’t really care what the Democrats do.

    Either way: voting rights are now being used as leverage in the high-stakes battle over workers’ rights playing out in Wisconsin (and Illinois, where the Democratic Senators have gone in order to prevent a quorum to move forward on the budget bill).

    As an Eau Claire firefighter said last week, “once people start stripping workers’ rights, next thing you know its going to be civil rights . . .” Who knew how right he would be . . . or how fast it would happen.

    The photo ID legislation would require all voters to show a state-issued photo identification – either a driver’s license or state ID – every time they vote. Seems reasonable, right? Well, not exactly, when you consider: 36% of young people and over 70% of African-Americans ages 18 to 24 do not have a driver’s license. Further, an estimated 23 percent of people age 65 and older do not have a Wisconsin driver’s license or a photo ID. No student IDs allowed. No Social Security cards. No bank statements or utility bills. (We’ve written about some issues surrounding the Wisconsin photo ID proposal here.)

    In order to get a driver’s license or a state-issued ID in Wisconsin, people have to go to the DMV. A few problems with that: 26% of Wisconsin’s 91 DMVs are open one day a month or less; Wisconsin has only one DMV with weekend hours; and three Wisconsin counties have no DMVs. (Check out all the stats by clicking here.) I could have sworn that voting is a fundamental, constitutional right that shouldn’t be subject to one’s ability to get to the DMV and pay for an ID. I digress.

    How can the Senate take up the voter ID bill if they can’t vote on the budget bill? Republicans have 19 seats in the Senate, but a 20-vote quorum is needed to move forward on bills that spend money (like the controversial budget bill that also strips collective bargaining rights for unions). Right now, the photo ID bill also would need 20 Senators present – which they don’t have with the Democrats in Illinois – because it provides funding to give free IDs to those that don’t have them. The Senate leader has said that the bill could be amended to remove the spending so consideration of the bill can move forward (presumably speeding right into an un-Constitutional wall because of its impact on poor, minority, older, and younger voters; again, I digress).

    A Senate committee is scheduled to take up the photo ID bill tomorrow and a final vote in the Senate could come as early as Wednesday. Stay tuned.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    UPDATE: War on Voting

    Friday, February 18th, 2011

    The war on voting continues and we have updates in five states this week. (If you missed last week’s update, you can check it out here.)

    MISSOURI

    The Missouri Senate passed legislation on Thursday, February 17 to amend the state constitution to allow laws requiring voters to show a Missouri ID at the polls. According to an article in the Kansas City Star, “Sen. Jolie Justus, a Kansas City Democrat, tweeted following the debate that the Senate had ‘just voted to disenfranchise at least 230,000 voters.’” (That is about the number of currently and lawfully registered Missouri voters who do not have a photo ID.)

    If the measure passes in the House – and it took a step in that direction by being voted out of committee this week – it will be up to you, dear Missouri voters, to decide whether to pass the constitutional amendment and allow the photo ID legislation to go into effect. The question of changing the constitution to allow strict photo ID laws would be on the 2012 ballot.

    MAINE

    Maine is also pushing to join the ranks of states that will force citizens to show a valid Maine ID on Election Day in an effort to stop the scourge of voter impersonation.

    According to the Maine League of Women Voters, there have been two cases of voter fraud in Maine in the past 30 years, and both cases were inadvertent mistakes that would not have been prevented by a requirement for photo identification.

    An estimated 100,000 Maine voters do not have valid photo identification, and many of them are elderly and poor, according to Ann Luther of the League of Women Voters.

    To avoid violating the 24th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which forbids poll taxes, the state would be required to provide people with free photo identification, she said.

    IOWA

    The Iowa clerks, who are responsible for running elections in the state, came out this week against tougher voter ID laws. The news is noteworthy because 60 percent of the county clerks are Republicans and they came out against the Republican legislature’s and Governor’s proposal. According to the Des Moines Register, the clerks concluded that a new law would be ” expensive, would pinch voter turnout — and is unnecessary”:

    “We already have a very secure elections process. It doesn’t seem to make good sense in tough economic times to increase the costs and make it more difficult to vote,” said Tom Slockett, Johnson County’s 34-year elections chief.

    NORTH CAROLINA

    In a state where the new Republican majority has proposed to pass photo ID legislation in the first 100 days, North Carolina college voters could be really out of luck. New voter ID requirements would only apply to one kind of voter – someone who goes to the polls – but not others (those who request an absentee ballot and vote by mail). Poll voters would be forced to present ID at the polls while mail-in absentee ballot voters would not have to show any ID.

    Could this be because of partisanship? According to Democracy North Carolina, most absentee ballots in North Carolina are requested by Republicans, while college students tend to vote for Democrats. Hmmm.

    On Wednesday, a coalition of voting rights groups came to the Capitol in Raleigh to demand that legislators “Respect My Vote,” including Common Cause NC, NAACP, Democracy North Carolina, NC A. Philip Randolph Institute, Southern Coalition for Social Justice, the League of Women Voters, NC Fair Share, Unifour Onestop Collaborative, the Institute for Southern Studies and more. Students from several Historically Black Colleges and Universities were on hand, as well.

    You can listen to and read stories from just some of the hundreds of thousands of voters that could be disenfranchised by a voter ID law at: http://www.democracy-nc.org/VoterIDStories.html.

    NEW HAMPSHIRE

    Some encouraging organizing news in New Hampshire: students at Dartmouth are uniting across party lines to fight back House Bill 176. The bill would stop college students from being able to vote in state or local elections if they have not lived in New Hampshire for at least a year before enrolling in a New Hampshire college or university.

    The College Democrats, College Republicans, College Libertarians and Student Assembly, in addition to various other student and Greek organizations, cosponsored an event about the legislation. You can read about it here.

    . . .

    Check back for more updates soon. Suppression is un-American. Join the fight here.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    Update: War on Voting

    Friday, February 11th, 2011

    Here is a quick, end-of-the week review on some of the ins and outs in the War on Voting.  As you can see, this war has many different fronts. Here are updates on what’s happening in the states (in alphabetical order, no less!):

    Colorado: Republicans killed a bill that would have allowed 16- and 17-year olds to pre-register to vote and have their voter status “activated” when they turn 18.  The party-line vote of 5 to 4 in the State, Military and Veteran’s Affairs Committee in the state House put the kibosh on the bill indefinitely.

    Our friend Steve Fenberg at New Era Colorado had this to say: “We’ve seen this policy have a big impact in increasing civic engagement among young people in other states.  It’s a shame that Colorado isn’t willing to take these critical steps towards increasing youth participation in our democracy as well.”  And he is right. A study conducted of pre-registration policies in Florida and Hawaii showed significant impacts on the amount of young people that turn out during elections. States like North Carolina, Maryland, and Rhode Island have adopted the policy.

    Kansas: The Kansas House of Representatives heard testimony on H.B. 2067, which would require all first-time voters to provide a birth certificate, passport or a photocopy when registering to vote. Voters would have to present a government photo ID at the polls.  You can read more here.

    Minnesota: The House Government Operations and Elections Committee voted along party lines to move a voter ID bill forward. Write up here.

    Missouri: We just learned that the state Senate will vote on its version of the photo ID bills on Monday.  The House Elections Committee will continue its consideration at a hearing on Tuesday, when opponents of the bills will finally have their say.  If you want your voice to be heard, contact your legislators now using our handy form.

    Young people have already spoken out in Missouri, like Thomas Bloom, who blogged for us about being boxed out of the first hearing early this week.

    Texas: A new voter ID bill is on the fast track to becoming law. The state Senate already passed it after declaring it an “emergency” issue. The state House will soon follow, and that may be all she wrote.

    Stay tuned for more developments. I didn’t even mention Wisconsin, North Carolina, or New Hampshire!

    Want to help fight back in these states and more? Join our campaign to stop young voter suppression.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com