• Categories

  • Post Archives

    • > Follow us on Twitter
    • Latest Posts

    • Meta

    Posts Tagged
    ‘student voting’



    Florida’s Attack on Rock the Vote and You

    Wednesday, April 27th, 2011

    Florida is on the verge of passing a law that will make it harder for groups like Rock the Vote and our volunteers to register voters, harder for you to cast your ballot, and, ultimately, harder to have your ballot counted. This is a direct attack on us, and it is a direct attack on you and your rights to participate as a voter and volunteer.

    Here’s how.

    First, the proposed legislation would put onerous restrictions on voter registration drives, imposing new bureaucratic requirements on voter registration organizations like Rock the Vote and potentially criminalizing volunteers who register voters. Third-party voter registration groups like ours would have to submit personal information on all of our staff and “registration agents” (we actually call them volunteers!) before we can register voters in Florida. Independent volunteers would have to do the same.

    Want to register voters at a concert with Rock the Vote? Or set up a registration drive on your campus? Or get your friends on the rolls? You will have to go down to the local elections office, provide a bunch of personal information, take an oath, and then be on the hook financially if you don’t turn in completed forms in two days.

    That’s right, completed forms would have to be submitted within 48 hours (down from 10 days right now) or groups and volunteers face fines of $50 for each late form. Volunteers would be personally liable if those forms don’t get in and could face up to $1000 in fines.

    And don’t you dare bring a friend with you to help register voters unless they’re on file with the state bureaucracy. They would be volunteering illegally. Clearly, they cannot be trusted.

    The Miami Herald suggested that it meant to harass volunteers and voter registration organizations. Sadly, that’s exactly right.

    Groups like the League of Women Voters already has said it would shut down their voter registration drives in the state. Rock the Vote would have to do the same. We couldn’t run our high school civics and voter registration program. We couldn’t let volunteers use our name to run registration drives on college campuses. We wouldn’t send volunteers to concerts and festivals to register young people.

    I’m starting to think that’s the point.

    Second, the proposed legislation (Senate Bill 2086 and House Bill 1355, for those of you keeping track at home) would eliminate the ability of voters to update your registration information, like a change of address, at the polls. The new law would repeal a positive post-2000 reform and turn too many voters into second-class voters. Currently, for example, members of highly mobile populations – like students, young professionals, minorities, renters – who are registered to vote can update their information at the polling place and cast a regular ballot. Under the new law, they would not be allowed to change their information and would have to cast a provisional ballot. Newly married women who change their last name but not their voter registration information will be forced to bring their marriage certificate with them to the polls and, even then, would only be allowed to cast a provisional ballot. In 2008, half of the provisional ballots were thrown out, including all provisional ballots cast in the wrong precinct.

    Third, the legislation would cut down the early voting period from 13 days to five days. Florida historically has issues with hours-long lines during early voting and even longer lines on Election Day. Naturally, rather than expanding opportunities to vote and making the process more efficient, Florida politicians are taking the state in the opposite direction. The negative effect of limiting early voting opportunities is reminiscent of the Yogi Berra quip about a popular restaurant: “Nobody goes there anymore. It’s too crowded.” Of course you would want to get rid of something as popular as early voting, right? There is little doubt that voters will face more crowds and fewer opportunities to vote, reducing the number of people who subject themselves to the hassle of exercising their rights.

    Rock the Vote is the nation’s largest voter registration organization. Over the last 20 years, we have registered more voters than any other organization or campaign, including more than 2 million in 2008 and 250,000 in 2010. Through our various programs – online voter registration, on-the-ground registration drives on campuses and at concerts with volunteers, and our high school civics program – we have put hundreds of thousands of young voters on the rolls in Florida. All of that could end under this law.

    Across the country, we see other attempts to make it harder for young people to register and vote. Politicians in 30 states are pushing laws that require voters to produce narrow set of photo identification at the polls, identification that many young people just don’t have. There are efforts to eliminate same day registration that allows people to register to vote and cast their ballot at the same time in states that have had this policy for years and lead the nation in voter turnout. Legislatures are shortening convenient early voting periods, even though voters are increasingly using these opportunities.

    What’s going on here? I hate to say it, but it is starting to look like they don’t want you to vote.

    Want to do something about it? Check out the Rock the Vote, Don’t Block the Vote campaign and fight back.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    Some Progress in North Carolina?

    Thursday, March 31st, 2011

    Some interesting news from North Carolina today: the sponsors of the new voter ID legislation have dropped the requirement to present a photo ID at the polls.

    Voters will still need to show some form of identification at the polls, but rather than narrowing that list to only government-issued photo IDs, the bill would allow voters to use a voter registration card (everyone gets one in the mail), a current utility bill, bank statement, paycheck, government check and other documents as a valid identification.

    If the reports are true, then this is some progress. But we aren’t home yet. Not on the list: student IDs. That’s a big problem.

    If you are someone who thinks we shouldn’t be making it harder for people to vote, let’s be clear: This bill is a lot worse than the current law, which has been working for years and already penalizes anyone involved in voter fraud.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    NC Student’s Quest for ID

    Thursday, March 10th, 2011

    If someone approached me and asked what Voter ID is, I would most likely say that it is a clever way for legislators to disenfranchise voters, and ultimately undo all of the hard work of our ancestors who fought for our right to vote.

    In the great nation of the United States, minorities have been fighting for their rights as natural born citizens for over four hundred years. It was not until the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, that minorities, particularly African-Americans, finally obtained a right critical to their existence in this country; the right to vote. Although the Constitution had all ready established that right in the 15th Amendment, it had not been recognized by the states. Regardless of race, color, gender or creed, we spent over a century trying to make being a citizen in this country simple. African American’s right to vote was constantly guarded by groups like the Ku Klux Klan, racist state officials, gerrymandering, poll taxes, and outrageous election schemes. It was not until 1965 that voting became as simple as signing your name on the class roster.

    In North Carolina, voting has been for the most part hassle free. In fact, we had over 4 million citizens vote in the 2008 election with a large amount of uncommon voters i.e. students, elderly, and disabled.

    I am a student at Shaw University in Raleigh, NC. I am an out-of-state student from Georgia and I have been living in Raleigh for about three years. In the 2008 Presidential Election, I proudly exercised my right to vote for the first time. I had registered in Raleigh after only living here for about 47 days. Again in the 2010 mid-term elections, I voted in Raleigh. During my two voting experiences, I did not have to produce any form of photo identification. However, being aware of the many election schemes that had taken place in other states, I had my Georgia license on hand. Unfortunately, voting will not be as simple for an out-of-state student attending a private college or university in the next election.

    If Voter ID is implemented in North Carolina, students like me, will be forced to transport themselves to the Department of Driver Services and purchase a NC State ID. The process for that alone is cumbersome and almost impossible for a full time college student. This process has the potential to cause apathy. In an effort to experience what that process would be like, I took three hours out of my normal school day and attempted to obtain a NC State ID card.

    Watch the video:

    According to Voter ID, I am not a citizen of the state where I presently reside.

    The United States has had issues with disenfranchising voters due to race, ethnicity, and gender since the voting process began. It was not until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that we saw a change. We went from ridiculous laws like the “Grandfather Clause,” countless schemes and strategies to confuse and undermine black voters, and heinous hate crimes to scare and intimidate black voters, to trying to discourage
    the young voters with a process called Voter ID.

    It is not only unfair, but unnecessary. The process itself does not acknowledge students who attend private colleges and universities, and it does not take into consideration the large amount of apathy it will cause amongst the young voters. Implementing Voter ID is something we cannot afford economically or socially. It is not enough to understand that it will cost the state unnecessary financial hardship for something that has not even proven to be an issue, but it is more of an issue of disenfranchisement taking a new form.

    I am against Voter ID because it directly affects me, and students like me. It allows for the legal negation of my natural rights as a citizen of the United States.

    Courtney Scott
    Bio: Courtney is a Rock the Vote guest blogger and a student at Shaw University in North Carolina.

    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    Sticks and Stones and Voting Rights (MT and NH edition)

    Monday, February 7th, 2011

    The headline in the student newspaper at the University of Montana, the Montana Kaimin, highlighted troubling attitudes about – and disregard for – the voting rights of young people: UNEDUCATED AND UNMOTIVATED: LEGISLATORS ATTACK INTEGRITY OF STUDENT VOTERS. Apparently, Montana legislators dish out their insults like Montanans drink their whiskey: straight up.

    They are not alone. As legislatures across the country push bills that erode youth voting rights, we are seeing some pretty egregious examples, notably in Montana and New Hampshire. Fortunately for these rights-crushing crusaders the U.S. Supreme Court never ruled that all students have the right to vote where they attend college. Oh, it did? In 1979?

    Well, thank goodness. That should stop ‘em. Until then…

    The Montana legislature abruptly killed a vote-by-mail reform bill and is now considering bills that would cancel Election Day registration and impose unnecessary voter ID restrictions, eliminating almost all forms of identification currently accepted when registering to vote.

    Check out the Montana Kaimin article recapping the debate on the vote-by-mail bill and see if you can detect an unyielding respect for the sanctity of voting rights for all citizens. Better yet, break out a pen and try to circle all of the insults:

    Student voting rights might be threatened by attitudes in the state legislature as characterized by House testimony Friday.

    Debating the legitimacy of mail-in ballots, some legislators suggested college students might attempt to forge ballots in addition to being unmotivated and uneducated.

    “I was definitely offended by some of the rhetoric in that debate,” said Rep. Michele Reinhart, D-Missoula.

    Discussion of HB 130 diverged from the topic of mail-in ballots to student voters when Rep. Tom McGillvray, R-Billings, suggested the removal of a clause that mandated voting outreach to students and other traditionally disenfranchised citizens.

    “Concerned individuals don’t need to be coddled and babysat to make sure they get it right,” he said.

    Ken Peterson, R-Billings, agreed and further suggested it would be reckless to encourage more university students to vote.

    “I went to college myself and I know that sometimes you are not very motivated to do the right thing,” Peterson said. “You are thinking about totally other things, so I don’t think we should set up a special class to try to drag them to the polls.”

    He clarified to the Kaimin Monday that he is fine with students voting if they have an interest in exercising that right, but he doesn’t think they need special treatment. Peterson said his experience in college was that many students didn’t care to vote.

    “I probably should have done it, but I wasn’t motivated in any direction like that when I was a student,” Peterson said. “Sometimes when you are in school, your brain doesn’t work real well.”

    These aren’t even all of the insults! To read the full story, click here.

    In New Hampshire, the legislature is poised to change the definition of residency in a way “that would bar college students in New Hampshire from voting in their college’s town.” As the Dartmouth newspaper noted:

    The bill changes the definition of domicile, requiring that an individual’s residence for voting eligibility “be the most recent place where he or she as an adult or where his or her parents or legal guardians with whom he or she resided as a minor established physical presence” demonstrating an intention to keep that place as “his, her, or their principal and continuous place of physical presence,” according to the bill.

    Why would the sponsors of the bill be concerned about students voting? Well, Republican Speaker of the House, William O’Brien, has a few reasons:

    He said students in college towns register to vote on Election Day “and are basically doing what I did when I was a kid and foolish, voting as a liberal.”

    He added: “That’s what kids do. They don’t have life experience and they just vote their feelings. And they’ve taken away the town’s ability to govern themselves. It’s not fair.”

    Well, at least he’s being honest! Who knew politicians could be such straight shooters?

    Bottom line: there are lots of threats to voting rights across the country. We are on top of it and will have more for you soon. (In fact, you can sign up to be in the loop here: http://www.rockthevote.com/campaigns/suppression/.) Until then, enjoy being unmotivated, uneducated, coddled, and, of course, getting your special treatment. Silly kids with brains that don’t work well.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com



    Missouri Voter ID, Round 93

    Friday, February 4th, 2011

    The Missouri legislature wants all voters to present government-issued photo identification at the polls. Sounds reasonable. Oh wait, they passed a bill like that in 2006 and it was struck down as unconstitutional by the Missouri Supreme Court because it would disenfranchise people. They are back again in 2011 – for the fifth time! – and this time they are going to change Missouri’s constitution.

    Right now, state law allows voters to prove their identity with documents that do not contain photographs, such as copies of current utility bills, bank statements or paychecks listing their names and addresses, and with other forms of photo ID, like a student ID. Not good enough, apparently, because there are hordes of people who go to the polls on election day and pretend to be someone out. Voter fraud is everywhere!

    Or not at all.

    The kind of fraud that the bill claims to stop – someone impersonating a registered voter – just doesn’t happen in Missouri. Seriously, never. The Secretary of State says there has never been an instance of voter impersonation fraud in Missouri. And if it did happen, it is a felony that is punishable under existing law.

    Could it be that the target is actually something else? Like the 250,000 registered voters in Missouri who don’t have a state-issued ID, like lots of students, seniors and poor people?

    Under the “new” proposals, here is what you would need to show at the polls:

    • a non-expired Missouri driver’s license;

    • a non-expired or nonexpiring Missouri nondriver’s license;
    • any identification containing a photograph issued by the Missouri National Guard, the United States armed forces, or the United States Department of Veterans Affairs; or
    • a document issued by the United States or the state of Missouri containing the name of the voter which substantially conforms to the most recent signature in the individual’s voter registration records, a photograph, and an expiration date or if expired, the expiration is after the date of the most recent general election.

    What’s not on the list? Any other form of ID, such as college IDs and out-of-state IDs, so many students and mobile residents be out of luck.

    Just get a “free” ID, they say. We’ll there isn’t much free about having to go through an unnecessary and arduous process of acquiring one at the Department of Revenue in order to vote. That was the Missouri Supreme Court’s primary main concern when it struck down the photo ID law in 2006. Why’s that? Because Missouri citizens must provide ALL of the following documents to get a photo ID:

    1. Proof of Lawful Presence – e.g. certified birth certificate which can cost $5-$30 and takes up to 10 weeks to get;

    2. Proof of Lawful Identify – a Social Security card;
    3. Proof of Residency – a current utility bill or government check with address; and
    4. Proof of Name Change (if you have changed your name) – marriage licenses, divorce decrees, court orders, adoption papers, and amended birth certificates (all of which also come at a cost if they need to be reissued).

    At a time when the state has a $700 million budget gap, this proposal would cost at least $21 million in new taxpayer money over the next three years. It also seems strange that during this period of high unemployment politicians would be more focused on gaming the system to keep their jobs instead of worrying about you and your job.

    There is going to be a hearing on versions of this legislation in the state House of Representatives on Tuesday, February 8th (this Tuesday!) at 8:00 a.m. Are you going to be in Jefferson City on Tuesday? Want to testify against this unnecessary and costly suppression of voting rights? Let us know.

    Thomas Bates
    Bio: Thomas is Rock the Vote's Vice President of Civic Engagement.
    @BatesThomas
    Email the author at: blog(at)rockthevote.com