<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christina Aguilera on Access Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blog.rockthevote.com/2008/07/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blog.rockthevote.com/2008/07/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood.html</link>
	<description>The official Rock the Vote Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:59:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: emme</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.rockthevote.com/2008/07/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood.html/comment-page-1#comment-3246</link>
		<dc:creator>emme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs1195.pair.com/rockvote/rtvblog/2008/07/10/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood/#comment-3246</guid>
		<description>Really Cool !&lt;br/&gt;Let&#039;s ho TO VOTE!&lt;br/&gt;(:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really Cool !<br />Let&#8217;s ho TO VOTE!<br />(:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stgnoc</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.rockthevote.com/2008/07/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood.html/comment-page-1#comment-3242</link>
		<dc:creator>stgnoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs1195.pair.com/rockvote/rtvblog/2008/07/10/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood/#comment-3242</guid>
		<description>Julia, on Celebrity Babies you said - &quot;You all bring up great comments, about the flag and how we should respect it. This is an issue that will probably be addressed by the next Congress, so if you really want to weigh in, register to vote.&quot;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What exactly are you talking about?  Is Congress considering changing the Standards of Respect?  I haven&#039;t heard any talk of such a thing.  I personally have two close friends who are members of Congress (I live in Washington, DC, and have taught their children), and I will be asking them if this is a true statement.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If it&#039;s not, you really shouldn&#039;t try to pass on such information, just to get people to vote.  This is the kind of thing that bugs me so much about groups like rock the vote.  NOT EVERYONE WAS MEANT TO VOTE.  You are out there encouraging people to vote, but half of those people will not take the time to choose a candidate properly.  Sure, some will, and to those that you reach who do build up their knowledge before voting, I say, way to go, but that&#039;s not what happens the majority of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, on Celebrity Babies you said &#8211; &#8220;You all bring up great comments, about the flag and how we should respect it. This is an issue that will probably be addressed by the next Congress, so if you really want to weigh in, register to vote.&#8221;</p>
<p>What exactly are you talking about?  Is Congress considering changing the Standards of Respect?  I haven&#8217;t heard any talk of such a thing.  I personally have two close friends who are members of Congress (I live in Washington, DC, and have taught their children), and I will be asking them if this is a true statement.</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s not, you really shouldn&#8217;t try to pass on such information, just to get people to vote.  This is the kind of thing that bugs me so much about groups like rock the vote.  NOT EVERYONE WAS MEANT TO VOTE.  You are out there encouraging people to vote, but half of those people will not take the time to choose a candidate properly.  Sure, some will, and to those that you reach who do build up their knowledge before voting, I say, way to go, but that&#8217;s not what happens the majority of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Nazrat</title>
		<link>http://www.blog.rockthevote.com/2008/07/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood.html/comment-page-1#comment-3240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Nazrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 07:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qs1195.pair.com/rockvote/rtvblog/2008/07/10/christina-aguilera-on-access-hollywood/#comment-3240</guid>
		<description>Just thought you might like this, regarding the 2008 Presidential Election.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are you influential or is it incidental?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Does it make one more powerful to talk in riddles, does one twist your mind into liking them, do you really know who they are… &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are you influential or is it incidental?&lt;br/&gt;Do you have the potential or credentials?&lt;br/&gt;Is it essential or confidential?&lt;br/&gt;Is it tangential to be prudential? &lt;br/&gt;Or is this sequential to be influential?&lt;br/&gt;Is it consequential this deferential?&lt;br/&gt;I say the prudential fills in the differential&lt;br/&gt;Giving the potential to have the credentials&lt;br/&gt;This could be exponential to the existential&lt;br/&gt;Preferential of the Presidential&lt;br/&gt;No this is not nonessential!&lt;br/&gt;It should be considered the quintessential essential&lt;br/&gt;For the providential Presidential to be reverential&lt;br/&gt;I declare this jurisprudential!&lt;br/&gt;For the Presidential to become residential&lt;br/&gt;This is not inconsequential it will show the potential&lt;br/&gt;Of the credentials of the Presidential &lt;br/&gt;Allowing them to be influential!&lt;br/&gt;Translation:&lt;br/&gt;Are you high-ranking or is it secondary? Do you have the capability or qualifications? &lt;br/&gt;Is it necessary or secret? Is it conflicting to be wise? Or is this correct to be powerful ?&lt;br/&gt;Is it significant to be respectful? I say the wise fill in the gap, giving the promise to have the qualifications .&lt;br/&gt;This could be the advocate to the existing, Privilege of the Presiding President. No this is not unnecessary! &lt;br/&gt;It should be considered the ideal element for the fortunate Presiding President to be reverent. &lt;br/&gt;I declare this the law! For the Presiding President to reside. This is not unimportant it will show the possibility, &lt;br/&gt;Of the qualifications of the Presiding President allowing them to be powerful!&lt;br/&gt;Let me break it down for you, again! Are you really qualified to stand up for me???&lt;br/&gt;Will you fight for my rights??? Or, will you use me to get what is best for you???&lt;br/&gt; Are you wise enough to know the difference??? Or is this your secret to being powerful???&lt;br/&gt;Do you have respect for me??? Do you feel it is required for you to share this truth???&lt;br/&gt;I say, if you show me the respect… Then you truly will have the ability to close the gaps…&lt;br/&gt;This will support and make the office obtainable for you… &lt;br/&gt; This will give you the right to take the chair as the director of our lives, our Country…&lt;br/&gt;No this is not unnecessary… It should be considered the perfect reining factor…&lt;br/&gt;For the blessed Leader to have respect for their people… To act on the peoples behalf and not their own!!!&lt;br/&gt;I declare this the law!!! In order for the President to have the right to live in our White House!!!&lt;br/&gt;This is not trivial… It will be the evidence that we can be a great Country, once again!!!&lt;br/&gt;Because we have a President that looks out for his people with respect to all!!! This will make him powerful!!!&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;Written By: Jane Nazrat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought you might like this, regarding the 2008 Presidential Election.</p>
<p>Are you influential or is it incidental?</p>
<p>Does it make one more powerful to talk in riddles, does one twist your mind into liking them, do you really know who they are… </p>
<p>Are you influential or is it incidental?<br />Do you have the potential or credentials?<br />Is it essential or confidential?<br />Is it tangential to be prudential? <br />Or is this sequential to be influential?<br />Is it consequential this deferential?<br />I say the prudential fills in the differential<br />Giving the potential to have the credentials<br />This could be exponential to the existential<br />Preferential of the Presidential<br />No this is not nonessential!<br />It should be considered the quintessential essential<br />For the providential Presidential to be reverential<br />I declare this jurisprudential!<br />For the Presidential to become residential<br />This is not inconsequential it will show the potential<br />Of the credentials of the Presidential <br />Allowing them to be influential!<br />Translation:<br />Are you high-ranking or is it secondary? Do you have the capability or qualifications? <br />Is it necessary or secret? Is it conflicting to be wise? Or is this correct to be powerful ?<br />Is it significant to be respectful? I say the wise fill in the gap, giving the promise to have the qualifications .<br />This could be the advocate to the existing, Privilege of the Presiding President. No this is not unnecessary! <br />It should be considered the ideal element for the fortunate Presiding President to be reverent. <br />I declare this the law! For the Presiding President to reside. This is not unimportant it will show the possibility, <br />Of the qualifications of the Presiding President allowing them to be powerful!<br />Let me break it down for you, again! Are you really qualified to stand up for me???<br />Will you fight for my rights??? Or, will you use me to get what is best for you???<br /> Are you wise enough to know the difference??? Or is this your secret to being powerful???<br />Do you have respect for me??? Do you feel it is required for you to share this truth???<br />I say, if you show me the respect… Then you truly will have the ability to close the gaps…<br />This will support and make the office obtainable for you… <br /> This will give you the right to take the chair as the director of our lives, our Country…<br />No this is not unnecessary… It should be considered the perfect reining factor…<br />For the blessed Leader to have respect for their people… To act on the peoples behalf and not their own!!!<br />I declare this the law!!! In order for the President to have the right to live in our White House!!!<br />This is not trivial… It will be the evidence that we can be a great Country, once again!!!<br />Because we have a President that looks out for his people with respect to all!!! This will make him powerful!!!</p>
<p>Written By: Jane Nazrat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

