Okay, just kidding. This is a weird blog. And, yeah I’m a bit eccentric. So?

Dread

Peter Roskam isn’t the candidate we think he is. There is a “telling” issue within his campaign that speaks directly to the type of candidate he is. . .an individual that can not directly face conflict, can not move individuals to work as a team, and can not prioritize issues over self interest. Here is the incident that supports the claims above.

A female campaign worker, who worked for Peter in his State of Illinois office and moved to the campaign at Peter’s request, was working on an important RNC issue at campaign headquarters. Elizabeth Roskam (who I believe has aspirations of being the next Hillary Clinton) came in and redirected this person to stop everything she was doing in order to address a matter that was clearly of lesser priority, as it only concerned one individual, versus the RNC which impacted thousands. The campaign worker, who is no novice in local area politics, was taken by surprise and made an attempt to explain the project that she was working on and its importance to Mrs. Roskam. When Mrs. Roskam persisted, the campaign worker requested that she, “wanted to hear it from Peter” rather than Mrs. Roskam. At this point Elizabeth Roskam went on a tear, and berated this loyal campaign worker, who didn’t even try to make any further attempts to defend her position.

So Elizabeth Roskam tore off and got Peter, who explained to the campaign worker that what Elizabeth says. . .goes, for she is the “co-candidate” in this campaign.

Now the story goes on and the campaign worker, although she tries, just can not continue to work for this candidate that is “standing on the wrong principle” in order to keep peace in what appears to be a broken household. She tries to contact Peter directly to issue her resignation and work on a transition plan, however, Peter does not respond. In fact he avoided her and the entire campaign headquarters for over THREE WEEKS, just to avoid any further conflict. This campaign worker had to work through individuals in Springfield just to get a response on specific release issues that were of importance.

To top things off, the campaign workers husband was also working within the campaign, more on the financial side, which is where his expertise lies. Shortly after his wife departed, he was asked to leave. Of course, Peter Roskam did not even have the intestinal fortitude to sit down with this individual personally and have a discussion. For it was deemed (by Elizabeth) that if one was a “traitor” they must both be “traitors”, and that is essentially the facts as I know them.

After I listened to this story in amazement I wondered. . .what does she have on him? “Our candidate” is being controlled and does not seem capable of standing up for what is right even within his own campaign. If you notice, Elizabeth is making her presence known virtually everywhere, and I’m sure will continue to do so. For she has declared herself the co-candidate, and in her berating of that campaign worker, she was the one that likened herself to Hillary Clinton.

While I can not in good conscience support the Duckworth campaign, what I do support is a NO VOTE for Elizabeth, oh, I mean Peter Roskam. I urge you to do the same.